Posts Tagged "SEO"

Sean Cheyney wrote an article called 6 Reason Agencies Get Canned sometime in January.  Unfortunately, this article is just now getting around to me (sometime you are on top of things and sometime you aren’t).  I love this article! It gives 6 REALLY good reasons why agencies get canned, with 6 tips to follow ALWAYS if you are an agency.  I especially loved Sinkhole number 1, 2, 4, and 6.  The information was so helpful that I instantly quite working on a SOW (Scope of Work), and I made sure that I clarified anything I once took for granted as just “common language.”   In full disclosure, I have worked with and met Sean at AccuQuote via a search agency for about a minute.  I was brought on the team for some SEO Analytics consulting; I doubt I made a lasting impression.  He is a great guy who has his digital marketing act together.

However, his article also got me thinking about the mistakes clients often make in the relationship with their Agency.  While I admit that Agencies do stupid things to get fired (like sinkholes 1 through 6), a relationship takes 2.  Often a relationship ends not because the agency did something wrong as much as it didn’t help a client fully do something right.  Since I only worked with Sean for a minute and he does have his digital marketing act together, I’m going to say up front that he probably DID NOT make these mistakes.   However, not every marketer is Sean.  Relationships take 2 and it’s up to the agency to make sure that a client doesn’t make these mistakes.

Nothing but the fact…but please give us ALL the facts

It doesn’t matter if it is dealing with contracts, meeting times, or what’s for lunch, communication is important.  In some form, Sean mentions it in 5 of his 6 sinkholes.  Often clients tell agencies what they think is important.  They often include thoughts that aren’t supported by data, goals with no explanation of why, or opinions of work that are based out of niceness or political gain.

Agencies work better if they know EVERYTHING about your business.  We don’t care about what you think you know, but we want to know everything you know.  Data trumps intuition, and our job is to prove your theories right or wrong.   Basically, we can both think the sky is blue, but if data says that a purple sky converts better then the sky needs to start looking a little purpler.  So the more data you through at us the better we can server you.

Knowledge doesn’t stop at data.  No, it also needs to include your organization as a whole.  The more we know about your profitably the more we are able to push the envelope.  A $60 Cost per Lead is just a number if we don’t understand the reason behind why that is the target…even if it is just because you want to see if we can hit it.  The more we know about your internal politics the quicker we can find a way to arm you with reasons to promote a project…or at least an alternative solution that will work within your business culture.  And of course, the more transparent you and your organization are about how view us and our work, the quicker we can make changes to improve it.

Give us everything even if you think it is to remedial or not relevant.  So many problems can be resolved by simply just letting us, the agency, in to understand.

Setting the Right Goals is Key:

Setting accomplishable goals is a skill few people develop an expertise.  Yet, it is one of the most important skills in business.  Every business wants to make money.  That is given, so that is not a goal.  Growing Revenue by 30% Year over Year is a goal.  Acquiring new customers at a cheaper rate is not a goal, but acquiring 90 new customers by reducing our cost by 10% is a goal.  Do you see where I’m going with this?  Often the first comment out of a client’s mouth is, “Our main goal is to acquire more customers, increase lifetime value of a customer, and reduce cost.”  Well, I believe that is the goal of every company.  Not many business say, “I don’t want more customers nor do I want more money out of the ones I have.  Oh, and I would actually like to spend more money in the process.”

Lance once told me that we can get whatever goal a client wants, as long as they don’t care about volume.  You want to sell a Ferrari at a $1.00 per lead?  We can get it…if you don’t mind 1 lead in 3 years. Your business has goals.  You know what profitability level you need to be to survive.  You know how much you want to cut from your operating expense.  Oh, and I’m sure you have people planning on up selling present customers on something.  Set goals for your business, and be as transparent with those goals as possible.  Once people are on the same page, you will be surprised how quickly goals are reached.

Buying the Cow Doesn’t Mean Much if You Don’t Use The Milk:

My father-in-law always says that the 2 pieces of advice your should always take is from your lawyer and your doctor.  You paid a lot to get advice from someone who spent a lot to give advice; it’s not smart to ignore it.  It’s kind of the same way when consulting a search agency.  No, not every recommendation is going to be feasible.  We get that.  However, often there are small recommendations with big impact that just go by the waste side.  Reports aren’t worth anything, no matter how much you paid, if you don’t take action.

Ok, so you just received a tech audit saying that your very pretty and interactive site is completely wrong for search.  You know you can’t tell your higher ups that you have to spend another couple hundred grand and countless IT resources to design a new site.  Ok, tell the agency that.  Better yet, invite the agency to sit down with your web development team as have a 2 hour talk about why things are that way and why things can’t change.  It’s up to the agency to help you find the ways around certain hurtles; it’s up to them to help YOU implement.  Most good search agencies will help you find a work around.

On the flip side, doctors sometimes suggest open heart surgery.  As much as it sucks, sometimes you have to follow the recommendation if you want to survive.   Agencies are the same way with recommendations.  We will take into account as much as we can, but sometimes we really do mean that if you want your digital marketing strategy to survive then you have to update that website which was built in 1995.  Sometimes open heart surgery is the only way to go. 

Agencies are Not Kids, Thieves, or Slaves:

Agencies are not kids, thieves, or slaves…so don’t treat them as such.  A good client will understand that a good agency can take some abuse.  If you don’t like the work or the strategy, speak up.  A good agency will alter paths or change what it’s doing if you say, “I don’t like this.”   Don’t be afraid to hurt our feelings.  We will be more devastated if you tell us you are firing us than if you don’t like the way a project turned out.  If you don’t tell us what you are feeling, we can’t help.

Good agencies are not thieves and will give money back if we don’t use it…or feel we can’t use it effectively.  Please look over the billing to make sure everything is correct.  By all means, make sure the contract is legit.   After that, have some faith in the plans we present.  If they are not on strategy then speak up (see paragraph above).  However, a good agency will put together a plan to grow your business…not spate you from your money.  When looking at a plan, look at it in that way.  This is the best plan they came up with, acceptable or not?  If it is, then go forward and prosper.  If not, tell them to go back to the drawing board and do it again.   Not every plan will be a home run, and agencies know that.  But give them the guidance under the assumption that what they push forward is what they feel is the best for you.  It wasn’t some snake oil to get more money out of you.  Resolution Media will happily go back to the drawing board because it always tries to put the best plan forward given YOUR goals… and they are not afraid to go back to a drawing board if they didn’t get something right (yes, that was a plug for my parent agency…but also a truthful fact about the ethics of RM).

Also, agencies are not your personal slave.  While we don’t mind doing you a couple favors, we have work to do for you.  We try to maximize our hours that we spend on you to your advantage…by executing a strategically built plan that is agreed upon by both parties.  Trying to boss your agency around so you think you have them under control actually works in your detriment.  We are trying to grow your business (our business grows only if yours grows).   You don’t have to crack the whip to get great work out of a good agency…all you have to do is communicate.

Technorati Tags: , ,

If you have been reading Intellect Interactive for the past couple weeks you will know that I started another blog on Inexpensive Wine Reviews. If you look at the bottom of this blog, you will notice that I’m running WordPress because mainly because the flexibility of the open source program is fantastic. Nate’s Wine Reviews is running on Blogger because I didn’t want to pay for hosting (a wine hobby is expensive enough).On a side note, I also wanted to see which blogging platform was better for SEO? Now I usually don’t write about product reviews, but this is a side-by-side comparison that I find really interesting.

SEO Background Facts:

I started Intellect Interactive about 4 months ago. Nate’s Wine Reviews was launched this month. I have haven’t done any link building for Nate’s Wine Reviews (other than posting a link on this blog), but I have done some link building for Intellect Interactive (several posts within Yahoo Answers, Wiki.Answers.com, all of my social networking sites, and some friends like Blue Chip SEO, Digital Sea Change, vidiSEO, and Bryson Meunier). I realize that the link building hasn’t been that robust, but that has been by design until I have enough content to really generate some consistent buzz.

Intellect Interactive has a pretty clean URL structure with a tone of targeted keywords. NWR has the basic Blogger URL structure. II actually has more content and URLs, a controlled Robots.txt file, an XML sitemap summited to Google. I summited NWRs atom feed to Google instead.

Both URLs are completely original (i.e. I created them…no one owned them before me). This means Google has no history on either URL before I started them.

So all things equal, Intellect Interactive should actually have the better rankings within Google. Well, you’re wrong. Google’s product, blogger, is actually doing better in the SERPS. Let’s look at the stats:

Index Stats:

Intellect Interactive: 0 URLs Indexed

Nate’s Wine Reviews: 17 URLs Indexed (in fact, Google almost instantly shows a URL as soon as I release a new post).

Links:

Intellect Interactive: 167 Links, mostly from the blogs listed above

Intellect Interactive Google Webmaster Tools
Intellect Interactive Google Webmaster Tools

Nate’s Wine Reviews: 2 Links (including the one from my own blog)

Nate's Wine Reviews Google Webmast Tools
Nate’s Wine Reviews Google Webmaster Tools

SERPs for Brand Terms:

Intellect Interactive: Not Listed (click on the link image to see). While my Intellect Interactive Facebook fan page hasn’t yet showed up in my inbound links list, it is showing up in the top position.

Intellect Interactive Google Search Results Page

Intellect Interactive Google Search Results Page

Nate’s Wine Reviews: First Ranking

Nate's Wine Reviews Google Search Results Page
Nate’s Wine Reviews Google Results Page

So, I’m going to have to say that Blogger is actually a better platform for SEO, despite all of WordPress’s extra features and easily installed plug-ins. As a platform, I really like WordPress. But Google seams to be responding better to its own platform. Interesting that Google’s product would work better for ranking in Google. Actually, it isn’t given that they would have the ability to make it as SEO friendly as they want it…and build the feed directly into the indexes. I’m not suggesting that you migrate your WordPress platform to blogger. Actually, I am suggesting that you start your blog out in Blogger and move your blog to WordPress once you have been around for about a year. You will welcome the CMS tools by then anyway. It’s something interesting to think about if you are going to launch a corporate blog.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

As tricky as it is, natural search optimization needs to take some notes from paid search and become better at using web analytics to assist in optimizations. The whys are simple to answer, but the hows are much harder.

At the beginning of the year, Lily Chiu over at Omniture blogged about her 2009 Optimization Wish List. Her first wish on the list is “Agencies getting on board” with multivariate testing. Last year I blogged about Optimizing Paid Search with Web Analytics. While more basic than multivariate testing, it was a start in the process of making that wish a reality. Quickly after that post went live, Bryson commented that the post could work with all forms of search (something that Omniture has been preaching for years). A few months ago, I switched my primary responsibility to focus more on the SEO and Web Analytics side of search.

While fairly easy in paid search, implanting web analytics based optimizations including multivariate testing, in SEO tends to be a little trickier. And it comes back to 2 simple problems: 1) a user segmentation dilemma 2) slightly conflicting goals.

When optimizing a page for natural search, we optimizers have to worry about two users: a spider and a real person. In a perfect world, the needs of search spiders would be perfectly in line with that of the actual end user. In reality, spiders interact with content for a completely different reason than end users…yet both are equally as important.

A search spider’s job is to look at content and data about a site and then determine a level of relevancy to a specific query. At the end of the day, it lives to help someone determine what site is the most qualified. It has a simple, but important job. Because of the importance of its job, we as optimizers try to do everything in our power to cater to the spiders needs (i.e. turn flash sites into html). But on our best day, we will never be able to convince the spider to buy anything on our site.

Thus leading us to the end users….the person we are hoping buys something. Once we get to that coveted 1st position ranking, we then have to worry about making sure that the page is still appealing to our potential customer. Again, in a perfect world those would be the same. And again, what “should” happen and what “does” happen are rarely the exact same.

So, how do we test for user experience (different calls to action, content presented in different ways, etc…) while still catering to the needs of a spider? The quick answer is progressive enhancements with a twist.

Here is the breakdown; you have to show the spider the content in one way while being able to test the presentation of the SAME content (or extremely close to it) without cloaking your site (no black hat tactics here). Start by developing a page that is html based and has plenty of optimized text and other features. The idea is when a mobile browser, text browser, or spider hits the page the browser/spider can interact with the content perfectly.

Next, find a multivariate testing tool that uses JavaScript to overlay itself on the base content (not replace the base content). Again, this is the same principle of progressive enhancement. With the proper tools, you can optimize the content (body text, titles, descriptions, etc.) separately from the way it’s presented to the potential customer (Do we need a video? Does the button belong on the left or the right? More color or less? Etc…).

The downside is that this will require even more coding to the page, which could be a resource drain. Also, the implementation of the JavaScript isn’t spider friendly (one of the reasons why this method works). If you don’t take the time to minimize the code of the multivariate program on the website, you run the chance of slowing the crawl of the spider.

Once it is set-up, the same KPI’s matter. Optimize away from high bounce rates and toward high conversion rates. Try to segment users for further testing.

Here is a slight kicker. In paid search, you can take two keywords that are very similar and send them to completely different pages. While you can in SEO, it is very difficult to have two pages rank for something like “page” vs. “pages.” So, while in paid you have the ability to keep keywords online longer and finally cut ones that don’t work; SEO is a little harder to manage at that level. Unfortunately, you will have to live with some keywords just performing poorly.

Also, take a look at the testing strategies for each user (spider included). You don’t want to get hit with a cloaking penalty, so make sure to sync up the content for each user after each test. If you find that using a verb a certain way helps sell a product better, distribute it to the rest of your users. Again, the idea is NOT to generate 2 different forms of content, but to test how each user engages with HOW the content is presented. And again, if you push the envelope and become too liberal in the separation of the two users, you will get hammered by the engines…and your testing will be for not. Like I said, this isn’t the easiest integration.

Integrating multivariate testing with natural search isn’t as easy as it is with direct traffic, paid search, or even display. But like everything, if you take the time to implement it right, you will be able to increase position within the engines while still improving site performance.

Natural search moves at a slower pace than any other online medium, so take the time to set up your plan correctly. Implanting correctly will give you a big jump over your competitors; shortcutting your plan could cause you to drop in the rankings. Happy hunting!!

Also Posted on Find Resolution: www.findresolution.com/2009/01/multivariate-test-in-seo-is-trick-but.html

Technorati Tags: , ,